MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070899884 · doi:10.2166/aqua.2006.015

Blending membrane treated WTP waste residuals with finished water: impacts to water quality and biofilm formation

2006· article· en· W2070899884 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Margaret E. Walsh, Graham A. Gagnon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Supply Research and Technology—AQUA · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWastewater Treatment and Reuse
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWater qualityEnvironmental scienceBiofilmWaste managementQuality (philosophy)Environmental engineeringWastewaterEngineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of blending filtered water with treated waste residuals streams from a water treatment plant on finished water quality and biofilm formation in a modelled distribution system. A mixed waste residual stream composed of an equalized blend of filter backwash water (FBWW) and clarifier sludge blowdown was treated with a pilot-scale ultrafiltration (UF) membrane. The UF treated residuals stream was blended with plant finished water to model a recycle return location to the clearwell of a drinking water treatment train. Field evaluations involved the use of bench-scale annular reactors (ARs) to investigate two parallel model distribution systems: (i) a control system representing 100% plant filtered water (AR-filtered) and (ii) a blended system representing 10% by volume of the UF permeate blended with plant filtered water (AR-blended). To evaluate the impact of chemical disinfection on bacterial regrowth and the fate of inorganic constituents, free chlorine, monochloramine and chlorine dioxide were fed to the ARs during three distinct disinfection trials. An initial disinfection trial consisted of a control run during which no disinfectant was added. The results of the field experiments showed that blending 10% by volume of the UF permeate with plant finished water did not significantly impact regrowth of heterotrophic bacteria in the bulk or biofilm phases. Throughout each disinfection trial, the largest difference in HPCs noted between the two systems was 1 log in the bulk and biofilm samples. Free chlorine and monochloramine disinfection resulted in the greatest mitigation of microbial biofilm in both AR-filter and AR-blended systems. Aluminum, manganese, and iron in the bulk phase were found to be below Canadian Drinking Water Guideline levels. However, the detection of manganese-oxidizing bacteria (MOB) and elevated manganese in biofilm samples from AR-blended could hold potential implications for blending UF treated residual streams on biofilm development and inorganic post-precipitation occurrences in systems treating source waters containing elevated concentrations of manganese.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.420

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Water Supply Research and Technology—AQUASame topicWastewater Treatment and ReuseFrench-language works237,207