Real-time cardiorespiratory coherence is blind to changes in respiration during general anesthesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: A novel real-time cardiorespiratory coherence (CRC) algorithm has been developed to monitor nociception during general anesthesia. CRC uses custom designed filters to track and analyze the respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) as it moves in time and frequency. CRC is a form of sensor fusion between heart rate and respiration, estimating the strength of linear coupling between the two signals. The aim of this study was to estimate the effect of changes in respiration rate (RR) and peak airway pressure (PPaw) on CRC. The response of CRC was compared to a prior offline wavelet-based algorithm (WTCRC) as well as traditional univariate heart rate variability (HRV) measures. A nociception index was created for each algorithm, ranging from 0 (no nociception) to 100 (strong nociception). METHODS: Following ethics approval and informed consent, data were collected from 48 children receiving general anesthesia during dental surgery. The times of change in RR and PPaw events were noted in real-time. A total of 43 RR and 35 PPaw change events were analyzed post hoc in pseudo real-time. The nociception index averages were compared between a baseline period and a response period around each event. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare changes. RESULTS: The change in RR changed the CRC nociception index by an average of -2.2 [95% CI from -10 to 4.7] (P > 0.3), and the change in PPaw changed the CRC nociception index by an average of 5.4 [-1.0 to 11] (P > 0.1). The changes were smaller than those of many traditional HRV measures. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time CRC was blind to the changes in respiration, and was less sensitive than many of the traditional HRV measures. A nociception index based on CRC can thus function across a wider range of respiratory conditions than can many traditional univariate HRV measures. The real-time CRC algorithm shows promise for monitoring nociception during general anesthesia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".