The production of mixed cultures containing strains of Lactococcus lactis, Leuconostoc cremoris and Lactobacillus rhamnosus , on commercial starter media
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mixed starters containing Lactococcus lactis, Leuconostoc cremoris and Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains were produced on commercial starter media (MB Complete, Thermolac, Marlac), as well as on milk. With the exception of Marlac, the starters were cultured under pH control. The effect of media and incubation temperature (22 or 32 degrees C) on population ratios, on specific acidifying activities (SAA) of the cultures as well as on their ability to produce aroma compounds in milk was studied. The starters had higher contents in lactobacilli when they were produced at 32 degrees C, whereas a tendency to obtain higher Leuconostoc populations was observed at 22 degrees C. With respect to the lactococci, there was a significant interaction between temperature and growth medium for both strains. Thus, Le. cremoris T2 reached higher populations at 32 degrees C if grown in MB complete and Thermolac, whereas in Marlac and skim milk, viable counts were higher at 22 degrees C. The lactococci represented 50% of the total population of the culture at the beginning of the incubation, but they composed between 80% and 99% of the total population following fermentation. The best medium for growth of Leuconostoc was milk, but populations of only 10(8) cfu/ml were reached. The lactobacilli did not grow well in MB Complete, and their development was best in the low-phosphate Marlac medium. The cultures grown on Marlac had the highest SAA values, whereas those grown on MB complete had the lowest. Overall, more ethanol and diacetyl were detected in the fermented milks when the starters used to inoculate them were produced at 22 degrees C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".