Molecular Characterization and Classification of Phytoplasmas Associated with Canola Yellows and a New Phytoplasma Strain Associated with Dandelions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DNA isolated from symptomatic canola (Brassica napus, Brassica rapa) and dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) was used to amplify 16S ribosomal DNA fragments by polymerase chain reaction using two pairs of universal primers P1/P6 and R16F2n/R2. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of the amplified DNA fragments using endonucleases AluI, HhaI, HpaII, MseI, RsaI, and Sau 3AI revealed two distinct types of phytoplasmas in canola with similar symptoms. One had the same RFLP profiles as the phytoplasmas in subgroup 16SrI-A, whereas the other one had RFLP profiles similar to those of phytoplasmas in subgroup 16SrI-B. Phytoplasmas were detected in symptomatic dandelion plants that were collected from canola and alfalfa fields where severe alfalfa witches'-broom occurred. Comparative studies indicated that two different phytoplasmas were associated with the dandelion plants. One was identified as a member of subgroup 16SrI-A, whereas another one was classified as a member of a distinct subgroup in the aster yellows group on the basis of the unique RFLP patterns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".