MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071065730 · doi:10.1097/jcn.0000000000000124

Association Between Self-reported Adherence to a Low-Sodium Diet and Dietary Habits Related to Sodium Intake in Heart Failure Patients

2014· article· en· W2071065730 on OpenAlexafffund
Eloisa Colin-Ramírez, Finlay A. McAlister, Elizabeth Woo, Nellie Wong, Justin A. Ezekowitz

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicSodium Intake and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Alberta Hospital
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsMedicineLow sodium dietDietary SodiumSodiumLow sodiumInternal medicineHigh sodiumDietary managementBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Sodium restriction is the primary dietary therapy in heart failure (HF); however, assessing sodium intake is challenging to clinicians, who commonly rely on patients' self-report of following a low-sodium diet to determine adherence. It is important to further explore the utility of self-reported adherence to a low-sodium diet in patients with HF. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between patients' self-reported adherence to a low-sodium diet and dietary habits related to sodium intake in patients with chronic HF. METHODS: Patients with HF seen in a tertiary care Heart Function Clinic and who have been taught on a low-sodium diet with a target of less than 2300 mg/d were included. Self-perception of compliance and dietary habits related to sodium intake was evaluated by using a dietary questionnaire. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to self-reported adherence to a low-sodium diet: never, sometimes, and always. RESULTS: Overall, 237 patients (median age, 66 years, 72.6% men) were included. Compared with the other 2 groups, patients who stated always following a low-sodium diet were less likely to use salt in cooking or at the table. However, 4.2% of the patients in the always group reported eating canned or package soups every day. Moreover, the highest proportion of patients eating fast foods 1 to 3 times a week was found among those in the sometimes group (22.9%) compared with the never (9.1%) and always (6.7%) groups (P = .002). Importantly, the rest of the food items did not show any significant differences between self-reported adherence groups. CONCLUSION: Self-report of adherence to a low-sodium diet is not reliable among patients with HF, who associate the idea of following a low-sodium diet mainly with not using salt for cooking or at the table but not with reducing frequency of intake of high-sodium processed foods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Cardiovascular NursingSame topicSodium Intake and HealthFrench-language works237,207