MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071122024 · doi:10.2340/00015555-0820

Platelet-derived Growth Factor Receptor Alpha Gene Mutations in Vitiligo Vulgaris

2010· article· en· W2071122024 on OpenAlexaff
S.J. Xu, Yaoqi Zhou, Sen Yang, Yongcheng Ren, Chang Zhang, Cheng Quan, Min Gao, Chuan He, H Chen, J Hhan, Jie Chen, Yanhua Liang, Jiajia Yang, Liangdan Sun, Xiuxian Yin, Jianjun Liu, Xu Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Dermato Venereologica · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicmelanin and skin pigmentation
Canadian institutionsVancouver Coastal Health Research InstituteUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver Coastal Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVitiligoGeneticsBiologyLocus (genetics)Gene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vitiligo vulgaris is an acquired depigmenting disorder resulting from the loss of melanocytes in the skin. Though several putative susceptibility loci of vitiligo have been identified in different populations, the pathogenesis of the disease remains poorly understood. Through genetic linkage analysis of a large Chinese family cohort of vitiligo, we identified a vitiligo linkage locus AIS4 within chromosome 4q12-q21, a region containing several possible candidate genes, including the platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) gene. We postulated that PDGFR mutations may be linked with vitiligo. To test this hypothesis, we performed DNA sequencing on this gene in 143 multiplex families with familial vitiligo vulgaris, 480 patients with sporadic vitiligo vulgaris, and 480 healthy subjects. Mutations were found in 3.5% of familial vitiligo cases, which is significantly higher than for the general population (0.42%, p = 0.008, Fisher's exact test), and possibly higher than in sporadic vitiligo patients (1.0%, p = 0.053). To our knowledge, this is the first observation that PDGFRA mutations are linked with familial vitiligo vulgaris.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.664

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Dermato VenereologicaSame topicmelanin and skin pigmentationFrench-language works237,207