MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071137895 · doi:10.1063/1.4769926

An acoustic backscatter-based method for estimating attenuation towards monitoring lesion formation in high intensity focused ultrasound

2012· article· en· W2071137895 on OpenAlexafffund
Siavash Rahimian, Jahangir Tavakkoli

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Oxford
KeywordsAttenuationAttenuation coefficientMaterials scienceBubbleUltrasoundBackscatter (email)OpticsTransducerPulse (music)AcousticsPhysicsComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work investigated the transient characteristics of tissue attenuation coefficient before, during and after HIFU treatment at different total acoustic powers (TAP) in ex vivo porcine muscle tissues. Dynamic changes of attenuation coefficient parameters were correlated with conventional B-mode ultrasound images over the whole HIFU treatment process. Two-dimensional pulse-echo radiofrequency (RF) data were acquired to estimate the changes of least squares attenuation coefficient slope (Δβ) and attenuation coefficient intercept (Δα0) averaged in the region of interest, and to construct Δβ, Δα0, and B-mode images simultaneously. During HIFU treatment, bubble activities were visible as strong hyperechoic regions in the B-mode images, causing fluctuations in Δβ and Δα0 estimations during treatment. Δβ and Δα0 increased with the appearance of bubble clouds in the B-mode images to values in the range of 1.5-2.5 [dB/(MHz.cm)] and 4-5 [dB/cm], respectively. After the treatment, Δβ and Δα0 gradually decreased, accompanied by fadeout of hyperechoic spot in the B-mode images, until they were stable at ranges of 0.75-1 [dB/(MHz.cm)] and 1-1.5 [dB/cm], respectively. In conclusion, Δβ and Δα0 images outperformed B-mode images in detecting HIFU thermal lesions by having significantly higher contrast to speckle ratios at all investigated TAP values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score0.820

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207