Experimental Study of Diffusive Tortuosity of Liquid-Saturated Consolidated Porous Media
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diffusive tortuosity factor is one of the key parameters in modeling solute diffusion in liquid-saturated porous media. However, the determination of diffusive tortuosity factor has to involve a diffusion process in liquid-saturated porous media, which was usually found complicated in laboratories. The incorrect use of diffusive tortuosity factor may cause significant errors in certain circumstances. This paper presents a method to evaluate the diffusive tortuosity factors for liquid-saturated consolidated porous media, i.e., sandstones, which are the typical porous media commonly encountered in contaminant transport in underground water and gas migration in liquid-saturated reservoirs. The proposed method applies two specific experiments to determine the diffusion coefficient in bulk liquid phase and the effective diffusion coefficient in liquid-saturated porous media, respectively. Diffusive tortuosity factor of the porous media is obtained by comparing the effective diffusion coefficient in porous media to the diffusion coefficient in bulk liquid. This study provides a procedure to evaluate the diffusive tortuosity factor for consolidated porous media and also the measured values of diffusive tortuosity factors for selected sandstone samples which can be used as input data for further studies. Another application of the proposed method is to determine the diffusion coefficient in bulk liquid phase for CO 2 from the measured effective diffusion coefficients in porous media.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".