MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071176035 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.393

TOUGHREACT modeling of the fate of CO2 injected into a H2S containing saline aquifer: The example of the Wabamum Area Sequestration Project (WASP)

2011· article· en· W2071176035 on OpenAlexaffabout
Maurice Shevalier, Michael Nightingale, Bernhard Mayer, Ian Hutcheon

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Procedia · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDevonianAquiferCalciteDolomiteGeologyCarbonateBrineDissolutionGeochemistrySupercritical fluidGroundwaterChemistryGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Devonian Nisku formation in central Alberta is potentially a suitable aquifer for CO2 sequestration. As with many Devonian aged aquifers in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, it contains H2S from thermochemical sulfate reduction. In spite of this, the Devonian Nisku represents a potentially desirable location as it is at the correct depth to ensure that CO2 is in the supercritical phase, it has multiple impermeable and low permeability barriers and there is very little hydrocarbon production in the formation. This paper presents a modeling study of the injection phase of CO2 into a saline aquifer in the Devonian Nisku formation at Wabamum Lake in Central Alberta. The object of the study is to evaluate the differences and problems, if any, between injection into a brine with an ambient amount of dissolved H2S and without dissolved H2S. The simulation covers a CO2 injection period of 50 years at a rate of 1 Mt/year. A one dimensional, radial symmetric model was used with a uniform carbonate composition. The mineral composition was from the Upper Nisku formation and a water composition from a producing water well in the Nisku formation. The model found that injected CO2 was stored as ionically trapped bicarbonate in a region of varying widths, 300 m wide after 1 year of injection to 3000 m wide after 50 years of injection represents from 2% to 3% of injected CO2. Small amounts are also trapped as calcite and dolomite. The H2S in solution does exsolve as gas during injection but this result is inconclusive due to the small amount of dissolved H2S present in the ambient brine. Overall, there were no noticeable differences between the models with and without ambient H2S in the brine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy ProcediaSame topicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsFrench-language works237,207