MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071178002 · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e3181bb69be

Temporal Resolution in Regions of Normal Hearing and Speech Perception in Noise for Adults with Sloping High-Frequency Hearing Loss

2009· article· en· W2071178002 on OpenAlexaff
Yanmei Feng, Shankai Yin, Michael Kiefte, Jian Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueEar and Hearing · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAudiologySpeech perceptionHearing lossNoise (video)Sensorineural hearing lossPerceptionTemporal resolutionSensitivity (control systems)PsychologyAcousticsSpeech recognitionComputer scienceMedicinePhysicsEngineeringArtificial intelligenceNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief Objectives: (1) To determine whether high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss (HF SNHL) is accompanied by deterioration in temporal resolution in the low-frequency region where hearing sensitivity is within normal range. (2) To evaluate whether such temporal processing deficits contribute to speech perception difficulty in noise. Design: A between-group design was employed, using subjects either with or without high-frequency hearing loss and matched by age. Temporal resolution was evaluated in amplitude modulation (AM) detection and gap detection tasks. To restrict evaluation to the low-frequency regions where the auditory sensitivity was virtually normal, low-pass noise carriers (for AM detection) and gap markers (for gap detection) were used. The impact of temporal processing deficits on speech perception was evaluated using hearing in noise tests (HINT) with varied time compression rates of the speech materials. Results: Adults with high-frequency hearing loss showed poorer performance than the age-matched normal-hearing subjects on both the AM and gap detection tasks, even though the stimuli were restricted to regions of observed normal sensitivity. With increasing time compression, listeners with HF SNHL required a larger signal to noise ratio to maintain accuracy in speech perception in adaptive HINT and exhibited a bigger decrease in score for HINTs at a fixed signal to noise ratio. Multiple regression/correlation analyses show significant correlation across the scores of AM/gap detection tasks and HINTs. Conclusions: Temporal resolution in the low-frequency region with near-normal sensitivity seems to be deteriorated in subjects with HF SNHL. They were more sensitive to increases in speech rate, suggesting that poorer temporal processing may be related to speech perception deficits in noise. Potential off-channel impact of high-frequency hearing loss of cochlear origin on the deterioration in temporal acuity was evaluated in AM- and Gap-detection tasks of low frequency region and the role of this deterioration on speech perception deficit in noise was evaluated in HINTs of varied time compression. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that the high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss deteriorates the temporal processing ability of low-frequency auditory channels. This deterioration may be related to the speech perception deficit in noisy background experienced by these subjects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.541
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEar and HearingSame topicHearing Loss and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207