MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Delivery of the Posterior Arm Reduces Shoulder Dimensions in Shoulder Dystocia

2006· article· en· W2071352913 on OpenAlexaff
Justin W. Kung, A V Swan, Sabaratnam Arulkumaran

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsIntecsea (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineShouldersImpactionCircumferenceShoulder dystociaPelvisPubic symphysisReduction (mathematics)SurgeryPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Roughly one in 200 births is complicated by shoulder dystocia—defined as a difficult shoulder delivery after delivering the head. The most common form is impaction of the anterior shoulder against the pubic symphysis, but impaction of the posterior shoulder against the sacral promontory or impaction of both shoulders can also occur. Most clinicians use the McRobert maneuver, suprapubic pressure, or the Woods maneuver to attempt to relieve the impaction before considering delivery of the posterior arm and shoulder—the “Barnum” maneuver. However, the Barnum maneuver might actually be helpful earlier if it provided a reduction in shoulder diameter and circumference compared with leaving both fetal arms by the sides. This study, which enrolled 33 term infants, was an attempt to compare a “one arm extended” technique with a “both arms by the sides” delivery to determine whether the former measure reduces shoulder diameter and circumference and whether it achieves a greater reduction in fetuses with relatively large shoulders. Within 72 hours of birth, bisacromial diameter (BAD) and axilloacromial diameter (AAD) were measured after tracing around the infant’s upper body while it was held motionless on a sheet; bisacromial circumference (BAC) and axilloacromial circumference (AAC) were measured directly. All measurements were made first with the newborn infant’s arms by its chest and then with one arm extended above the head. BAD values were comparable in male and female infants as were birth weights. Compared with the “both arms by the sides” technique, the “one arm extended” technique resulted in a reduction in BAD of 1 cm or more in approximately 90% of newborn infants, 1.5 cm or more in 72%, and a reduction of at least 2 cm in 44%. The mean ± standard deviation in BAD was 1.9 ± 0.69 cm. A similar mean reduction, 2.5 ± 1.2 cm, was seen in the AAC. Greater reductions were observed in newborn infants having greater shoulder diameters. The 2 diameters correlated with one another to a high degree. On average, the extent of reduction in the 2 diameters may be predicted from the following equation: Reduction (BAD − AAD) = 0.23 BAD −2.4 The difference between the 2 circumferences is accurately predicted by the following equation: Difference between BAC and AAC = 0.20 BAC −5.37 Compared with the “both arms by the sides” position, having one arm extended reduces shoulder diameter and circumference to a clinically useful degree. This is especially the case for heavier fetuses. Concern over manipulating the fetus may be overcome by adequate training using mannequins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrical & Gynecological SurveySame topicChild and Adolescent HealthFrench-language works237,207