The Structure of Yb<sup>3+</sup> Aquo Ion and Chloro Complexes in Aqueous Solutions at Up to 500 °C and 270 MPa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report here on X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) measurements used to determine the structure of the Yb 3+ ion in aqueous solutions over a range of temperatures from 25 to 500 °C and pressures up to 270 MPa. Fluorescence Yb L 3 -edge spectra were collected separately from nitrate (0.006 m Yb/0.16 m HNO 3 ) and chloride (0.006 m YbCl 3 /0.017 m HCl) aqueous solutions within a hydrothermal diamond anvil cell. The Yb−O distance of the Yb 3+ aquo ion in the nitrate solution exhibits a uniform reduction at a rate of 0.02 Å/100 °C, whereas the number of oxygens decreases from 8.3 ± 0.6 to 4.8 ± 0.7, in going from 25 to 500 °C. No evidence for nitrate complexes was found from measurements made on this solution. The Yb 3+ is found to persist as an aquo ion up to 150 °C in the chloride aqueous solution. In the 300−500 °C range, chloro complexes are found to occur in the solution, most likely of the type Yb(H 2 O) δ - n Cl n +3- n (δ ≈ 7). The Yb−Cl distance of the chloro ytterbium(III) complexes is found to decrease uniformly at a rate of about 0.02 Å/100 °C, whereas the number of chlorines increases from 0.5 ± 0.3 to 1.8 ± 0.2 in the 300−500 °C temperature range. Conversely, the Yb−O distance undergoes a lower uniform reduction at a rate of 0.007 Å/100 °C, whereas the number of oxygens decreases from 8.3 ± 0.5 to 5.1 ± 0.3 in going from 25 to 500 °C in the same solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".