MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2071375384 · doi:10.1029/2003jd004332

Tropical tropospheric ozone morphology and seasonality seen in satellite and in situ measurements and model calculations

2005· article· en· W2071375384 on OpenAlexaff
Jae-Hwan Kim, Sunmi Na, M. Newchurch, Randall V. Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTroposphereClimatologyTotal Ozone Mapping SpectrometerEnvironmental scienceTropical AtlanticAtmospheric sciencesTropospheric ozoneBorealSeasonalitySatelliteNorthern HemisphereRadiometerOzoneOzone Monitoring InstrumentTropicsSCIAMACHYSea surface temperatureGeographyMeteorologyOzone layerRemote sensingStratosphereGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An important issue in satellite remote sensing techniques for retrieving tropical tropospheric ozone is understanding the cause of the disagreement between ozone derived from satellite residual‐based methods and the precursor distributions seen in both the fire count distribution and the Measurements Of Pollution In The Troposphere (MOPITT) CO distribution over northern tropical Atlantic and Africa in boreal winter and spring. This discrepancy has been called the Northern Atlantic paradox; however, it actually extends eastward all the way to Indonesia. We define the disagreement as the northern tropical paradox. We employ the scan angle method (SAM) to solve the paradox. This algorithm takes advantage of the difference in the Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) retrieval information between nadir and high viewing angles. The averaging kernel for this difference exhibits a broad maximum centered at ∼5 km in the troposphere and thereby can be used to estimate tropospheric ozone information. The seasonal distribution of tropospheric ozone derived from the SAM algorithm shows remarkably good agreement with fire counts from Along Track Scanning Radiometer (ATSR), CO from MOPITT, TOMS aerosol index, and ozone distribution from the GEOS‐CHEM model in four seasons over the tropics. In meridional distribution, all of these products clearly reveal the seasonal oscillation between northern tropical Africa in boreal winter and over southern tropical Africa in boreal summer. The residual‐based methods (TOR, CCD, CCP, and modified residual), however, always show the ozone maximum over the southern Atlantic off the coast of southwest Africa. A further comparison with the in situ measurements from the Measurement of Ozone and Water Vapor by Airbus In‐Service Aircraft (MOZAIC) campaign at three locations over the northern tropics, Abidjan (5°N, 4°W), Madras (13°N, 80°E), and Bangkok (14°N, 101°E), supports our results. The seasonality of ozone from the SAM and the model, which shows the ozone maximum in boreal summer and the minimum in boreal winter, is in accordance with the MOZAIC measurements. However, the seasonality of the RBMs does not agree with the seasonality of in situ measurements. We conclude that the northern tropical paradox does not actually exist.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres→Same topicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate→French-language works237,207→