MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071405819 · doi:10.1021/jp804643c

Influence of Molecular Dipole Moment on the Redox-Induced Reorganization of α-Helical Peptide Self-Assembled Monolayers: An Electrochemical SPR Investigation

2008· article· en· W2071405819 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew J. Wain, Huy N. L., Himadri Mandal, Heinz‐Bernhard Kraatz, Feimeng Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Junctions and Nanostructures
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Institute on Minority Health and Health DisparitiesNational Institute of General Medical Sciences
KeywordsChronoamperometryMonolayerSelf-assembled monolayerChemistryFerrocenePeptideDipoleCyclic voltammetryElectrochemistrySurface plasmon resonanceElectrolyteCrystallographyMaterials scienceNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryElectrodePhysical chemistryNanoparticle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of ferrocene-labeled α-helical peptides were prepared on gold surfaces and studied using electrochemical surface plasmon resonance (EC-SPR). The leucine-rich peptides were synthesized with a cysteine sulfhydryl group either at the C- or N-terminus, enabling their immobilization onto gold surfaces with control of the direction of the molecular dipole moment. Two electroactive SAMs were studied, one in which all of the peptide dipole moments are oriented in the same direction (SAM1), and the other in which the peptide dipole moment of one peptide is aligned in the opposite direction to that of its surrounding peptide molecules (SAM2). Cyclic voltammetry combined with SPR measurements revealed that SAM reorientations concomitant with the oxidation of the ferrocene label were more significant in SAM2 than in SAM1. The substantially greater change in the peptide film thickness in the case of SAM2 is attributed to the electrostatic repulsion between the electrogenerated ferrocinium moiety and the positively charged gold surface. The greater permeability of SAM1 to electrolyte anions, on the other hand, appears to effectively neutralize this electrostatic repulsion. The film thickness change in SAM2 was estimated to be 0.25 ± 0.05 nm using numerical simulation. The timescale of the redox-induced SPR changes was established by chronoamperometry and time-resolved SPR measurements, followed by fitting of the SPR response to a stretched exponential function. The time constants measured for the anodic process were 16 and 6 ms for SAM1 and SAM2 respectively, indicating that the SAM thickness changes are notably fast.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicMolecular Junctions and NanostructuresFrench-language works237,207