MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071442804 · doi:10.1071/rdv25n1ab320

320 INFLUENCE OF PROGESTERONE AND MOMENT OF ESTRADIOL BENZOATE INJECTION ON MULTIPLE-OVULATION EMBRYO TRANSFER RESULTS

2012· article· en· W2071442804 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S. Kmaid, Juan Martín Tapia Saldaña

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstradiol benzoateEstrous cycleOvulationInternal medicineFollicular phaseTheriogenologyEndocrinologyMedicineAnimal scienceEmbryoAndrologyBiologyEmbryo cultureEstrogenEmbryogenesisHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current superovulatory treatment combines progesterone as well as oestradiol injection at the moment of CIDR insertion to improve synchronization of follicular wave emergence [reviewed by Bo et al. 2002 Theriogenology 57, 53–172; and Mapletoft et al. 2003 J. Anim. Sci. 81 (E. Suppl.), E28–E36] The aim of the present work was to study if delaying oestradiol benzoate (EB) injection 24 or 48 h from CIDR insertion would have the same outcome on embryo production after superovulatory treatment as additional progesterone administered at CIDR insertion. One hundred and eleven superovulatory treatments conducted during the same period (5 consecutive collection days) at random stages of the oestrus cycle at the same location were retrospectively evaluated. Holstein cycling heifers of 18 months of age (body condition score 3.2 ± 0.28, 1–5 range; weighing 357 ± 28 kg) were divided according to the following treatments: control group (n = 24): Day 0: CIDR insertion (Pfizer Animal Health, New York, NY, USA), 50 mg of progesterone, and 2 mg of oestradiol benzoate (Benzadiol, Universal Laboratory, Montevideo, Uruguay); Group BE24 (n = 47): Day –1: CIDR insertion and Day 0: 2 mg of oestradiol benzoate; Group BE48 (n = 40): Day –2: CIDR insertion and Day 0: 2 mg of oestradiol benzoate. All heifers were superstimulated on Day 3.5 (Day 0 = EB injection) with 290 NIH units of FSH (Folltropin, BionicheAnimal Health, Belleville, ON, Canada) in twice-daily decreasing doses over 4.5 days. On Day 6, all cows received 2 doses (a.m. and p.m.) of a prostaglandin F2a analogue (800 µg, Delprostenate, Glandinex, Universal Laboratory), and CIDR were removed on the morning of Day 7. Cows were injected with 10 µg of GnRH (Receptal, Intervet, Boxmeer, the Netherlands) on Day 8 a.m. and were inseminated 12 and 24 h later with semen of 3 bulls of proven fertility. On Day 15, ova/embryos were collected nonsurgically and evaluated in accordance with IETS guidelines. Data were analysed with a negative binomial regression model (Table 1). Administration of EB 24 or 48 h after CIDR insertion produced similar numbers of transferable and freezable embryos as well as total ova/embryos compared with addition of progesterone and EB at the moment of CIDR insertion. According to these results, EB could be administrated without progesterone injection either 24 or 48 h after CIDR insertion without compromising embryo production. Table 1. Embryo production of heifers superstimulated after additional progesterone (P4) and different times (24 or 48 h after CIDR insertion) of oestradiol benzoate administration (results are mean ± SE)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207