Effects of Environmental Characteristics of Aquaculture Sites on the Quality of Cultivated Newfoundland Blue Mussels (<i>Mytilus edulis</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examined (1) the effects of seasonal and annual environmental characteristics (temperature, chlorophyll content, salinity, microbial water quality, and algal lipid composition) in four aquaculture locations on the quality (meat content, shell size, and microbial and lipid compositions) of cultivated blue mussels and (2) the optimum harvest time for premium-quality mussels. Seasonal and annual temperature fluctuation of the seawater in the aquaculture sites significantly (P < 0.05) affected their salinity, microbial content, and algal fatty acid compositions, which in turn affected the quality attributes of cultivated mussels. The optimum growth period in terms of meat content (4-5 g) and shell size (50-60 mm) can be achieved within 1 year of cultivation. Because the cultivated mussels examined in this study never reached the maximum microbial load limits (10(5) or log 5 colony-forming units/g of meat), they can be harvested throughout the year. Meanwhile, no significant (P > 0.05) annual changes were observed in total omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids content of cultivated mussels. Nonetheless, the optimum harvest time may be April-June for eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) rich mussels and September-October for docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) rich mussels in terms of fatty acid proportions; however, June may be the best month for the highest concentrations of both EPA and DHA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".