MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2071577282 · doi:10.4000/lhomme.11161

Pierre Smith (1939-2001)

2002· article· fr· W2071577282 on OpenAlexaff
Michel Izard

Bibliographic record

VenueL Homme · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Intégré de Santé et Services Sociaux de Chaudière-Appalache
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IERRE SMITH a mis un terme à son retranchement du monde le 6 juin 2001, à Carignan, dans les Ardennes françaises, non loin de l'ancienne demeure maternelle de Florenville, de l'autre côté de la frontière.Il y a de cela plusieurs années, il avait fait choix d'emprunter un de ces sentiers de traverse sur lesquels l'euphorie du vagabondage peut faire oublier le risque de l'égarement.« Attiré par les études de lettres, puis de psychologie, dans les perspectives différentes offertes alors par Jean Piaget et Jacques Lacan, j'ai finalement choisi l'ethnologie, grâce à l'œuvre et à l'enseignement de Claude Lévi-Strauss » 1 .Pierre, qui est encore Peter, arrive à Paris en 1961, venant de Bruxelles.Après un bref passage par la Sorbonne, il acquiert sa formation d'anthropologue africaniste à la VI e section de l'École pratique des hautes études (1962)(1963)(1964), auprès de Georges Balandier et de Jacques Maquet, puis de Denise Paulme et d'Éric de Dampierre, en attendant de la parfaire à Oxford (1965)(1966)(1967), à Nuffield College et à l'Institute of Social Anthropology, dans le sillage d'Evans-Pritchard et de quelques autres, comme John Beattie, Godfrey Lienhardt ou Rodney Needham.C'est au cours de ces années d'apprentissage que Pierre participe aux travaux de l'équipe engagée, autour de Lucien Sebag, dans l'analyse structurale de mythes pueblos dont naîtra L'Invention du monde 2 .Par la suite, Pierre ne cessera de s'interroger sur la « nature des mythes », pour reprendre le HOMMAGE

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueL Homme→Same topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research→French-language works237,207→