MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071634128 · doi:10.7202/1013064ar

Literary Experiment and Female Infamy: Lady Mary Wortley Montagu fictionalizes her life

2012· article· en· W2071634128 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Isobel Grundy

Bibliographic record

VenueLumen Selected Proceedings from the Canadian Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIrish and British Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiteratureArtHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article relates to one entitled "Medical Advance and Female Fame," which also originated as a CSECS plenary paper in St. John 's, NL (1992).That dealt with Lady Mary Wortley Montagu's role in a great public event, the arrival in western medicine of the practice of securing immunity against smallpox by inoculation with the actual virus (technically called variolation).This was the first time that scientific medicine, as distinct from folk practice, had produced immunity through antibodies: a significant step in the Whig narrative of progress which is the history of western medicine. 1 For Montagu inoculation brought celebrity as the saviour of hundreds of lives.She was hailed in print by such luminaries as Voltaire and honoured with a memorial plaque in Lichfield Cathedral.The mark she made in the public sphere was just the highest point in a high-profile career.She had been toasted by the male elite of the Kit-Cat Club at eight and had repeatedly made the newspapers: with her elopement, her court satires, and her choosing to share her husband's ambassadorial journey to Turkey instead of waiting for him at home.Apart from headline moments, she became well-known for unpublished writings.On her last return to England from abroad she was lionized by upper-class Londoners anxious for a glimpse of her.Female fame indeed.1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLumen Selected Proceedings from the Canadian Society for Eighteenth-Century StudiesSame topicIrish and British StudiesFrench-language works237,207