MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071686643 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am10-4709

Abstract 4709: NXF2 is a Candidate Biomarker of Mechanical Stress in Breast Cancer

2010· article· en· W2071686643 on OpenAlexaff
Jiaxu Wang, Rebecca Barnes, Nathan West, Peter H. Watson

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerStromal cellGene expressionMicroarrayCancer researchCancerMicroarray analysis techniquesGene expression profilingBiomarkerBiologyCellCell cultureGenePathologyMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Mechanical stress has been implicated as an important factor influencing tumour cell biology. Due to the nature of early stages of breast cancer and its ductal environment and associated stromal changes, origins in ductal changes in gland tension are likely to occur and the associated mechanical forces may contribute to the progression of breast cancer. To identify specific changes in gene expression that might serve as biomarkers of mechanical stress in breast cancer, we applied static tensile forces (0.65 pN/μm2) to breast cancer cell lines via collagen-coated magnetite beads, profiled gene expression changes by Microarray chips, validation by RT-PCR and immunoblotting. Our results showed that mechanical stretch forces altered cell signaling in both MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cell lines by array chip analysis and 7.24.% genes (4.67% up and 2.57% down regulation) were regulated by mechanical stress in 16822 profiling genes in MDA-MB-231 cell line and 5.79% genes (2.22% up and 3.57% down regulated) was regulated in MDA-MB-468 cell lines. The 0.48% (82/16822) up regulation and the 0.125% (21/16822) down regulation was in complete concordance with Microarray in both cell lines. The validation of the gene expression with significant changes of >1.5-fold in MDA-MB-231 cell line, RT-PCR revealed the up-regulation of LCE2D and NXF2 and down-regulation of PIGH and RAPD1B and confirmed the force-induced genes identified by Microarray. Mechanical stress also increased 2.75 fold NXF2 protein expression level with confirmation of immunoblotting. There were no significant expression changes found relating to hypoxia stress control gene NDRG1, which changed the highest gene in hypoxia control chip. We conclude that mechanical stress promotes early breast cancer progression mediated by multiple signal transduction pathways and that NXF2 is a potential mechanical stress marker in breast cancer progression. Note: This abstract was not presented at the AACR 101st Annual Meeting 2010 because the presenter was unable to attend. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4709.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207