MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071763763 · doi:10.1109/newcas.2014.6934077

A low-power current-reuse analog front-end for multi-channel neural signal recording

2014· article· en· W2071763763 on OpenAlexaff
Hassan Sepehrian, S. Abdollah Mirbozorgi, Benoit Gosselin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neural Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCMOSAmplifierComputer scienceAnalog front-endElectrical engineeringNoise (video)Electronic engineeringTransconductanceChannel (broadcasting)TransistorEngineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studying brain activity in-vivo requires to simultaneously record bioelectrical from several microelectrodes in order to capture neurons interactions. In this work, we present a new current-reuse analog front-end (AFE), which is scalable to very large number of recording channels, thanks to its small implementation area and its low-power consumption. This proposed AFE includes a low-noise amplifier (LNA) and a programmable gain amplifier (PGA) which employ fully differential folded cascode current-reuse structures leading to decreased power consumption and silicon area. Moreover, the proposed AFE presents improved output swing compared to previous current-reuse topologies by employing different common mode feedback circuits for LNA and PGA. A 4-channel system implemented in a CMOS 0.18-μm technology is presented as a proof-of-concept. Post-layout simulation results are reported to verify its performance. The total power consumption of one channel including a low-noise amplifier and a variable gain stage is 8.2 μW (4.1 μw for LNA and 4.1 μw for PGA), for an input referred noise of 3.28 μV. The entire AFE presents four selectable gains of 45.2 dB, 50.1 dB, 55.3 dB and 59.65 dB, and occupies a die area of 0.035 mm2per channel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringFrench-language works237,207