Cancer Prevention in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and the Chemoprophylactic Potential of 5-Aminosalicylic Acid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The risk of colorectal cancer is increased in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's colitis. Regular dysplasia surveillance colonoscopy in chronic colitis generally has been adopted as a strategy to prevent colorectal cancer or at least to diagnose it in an earlier stage. This has not been proven to reduce mortality, but it does provide the clinician and the patient with some confidence that they are participating in an active strategy to deal with the problem of colorectal cancer in chronic colitis. Disease extent and duration have long been held to be risk factors for colorectal cancer in chronic colitis, and recently some special risk groups have been identified which may require either more intensive surveillance or alternative approaches to cancer prevention. These include patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis, patients with first-degree relatives with sporadic colon cancer, and possibly, patients with backwash ileitis. There is an emerging interest in potential chemopreventative strategies in both sporadic and colitis-associated colorectal cancer. There also have been suggestive data that chronic maintenance 5-aminosalicylate use might reduce the risk of developing colorectal cancer. Recent data have suggested some potential preventative benefit of using ursodeoxycholic acid in patients with ulcerative colitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. The scientific rationale for using these agents is sound but clinical data are lacking to fully support these approaches as chemoprevention in chronic colitis at present.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".