Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: The postmodern criticism and overcoming of the modern canons and concepts of rationality and science have paved the way to a systematic reconsideration of the nature and status of faith and religion in relation to human reason. The present article proposes to reassess the relationship tying Christianity to rationality through the study of the Christian notion of mystery, which, being fundamental to both Christian faith and theology, undergirds the definition and practice of Christian theology, faith, and love. The Christian God's self-revelation to human beings in history is shown to fully preserve the divine holiness and transcendence: God is incommensurable to creaturely reason out of an excess, infinitude of intelligibility. Called by God to enter in an immediate and intimate relationship with their Creator and Redeemer, Christian believers undertake, following Jesus Christ as a guide and model, a spiritual journey that leads them to transcend human language and concepts. Progressively opening themselves to an absolutely transcendent form of rationality identifying with the divine, Christians are by God interiorly transformed and enabled to directly experience him in and through love. The Christian notion of mystery characterizes human reason's fundamental rootedness in, orientation to, and insertion within supernatural, divine intelligibility and freedom. The latter, despite always being historically active and manifest, can never be fully fathomed and embraced by human cognition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.068 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".