Integrated Cytogenetic and High-Resolution Array CGH Analysis of Genomic Alterations Associated with <i>MYCN</i> Amplification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amplification of oncogenes and closely linked flanking genes is common in some types of cancer and can be associated with complex chromosome rearrangements and/or co-amplification of non-syntenic chromosomal regions. To better understand the etiology and structural complexity of focal MYCN amplicons in human neuronal cancer, we investigated the precise chromosomal locations of high copy number genomic regions in MYCN amplified cell lines. An integrated cytogenetic map of the MYCN amplicon was created using high-resolution array CGH, spectral karyotyping (SKY), multi-color banding (mBAND), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in 4 human neuronal tumor cell lines. The evidence of complex intra- and inter-chromosomal events, providing clues concerning the nature of the genomic mechanisms that contributed to the process of MYCN amplification, was observed. The presence of multiple co-amplified syntenic or non-syntenic sequences in the MYCN amplicon is quite intriguing. MYCN is usually centrally located in the amplicon; however, the structure and complexity of the amplicons were highly variable. It is noteworthy that clusters of unstable repetitive regions characterized by CNV sequences were present throughout the regions encompassed by MYCN gene amplification, and these sequences could provide a mechanism to destabilize this region of the genome. Complex structural rearrangements involving genomic losses and gains in the 2p24 region lead to MYCN amplification and that these rearrangements can trigger amplification events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".