Liquid-phase Mutual Diffusion Coefficients for Heavy Oil + Light Hydrocarbon Mixtures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
: Liquid-phase mutual diffusion coefficients are a key parameter in reservoir simulation models related to both primary production and envisioned secondary recovery processes for heavy oil and bitumen. The measurement of liquid-phase mutual diffusion coefficients in bitumen and heavy oil + light hydrocarbon or gas mixtures present numerous experimental and data analysis challenges due to the viscosity and opacity of the mixtures, the variability of density, viscosity and mutual diffusion coefficient with composition, and the multi-phase nature of these mixtures. Data analysis challenges are particularly acute. For example, recently reported mutual diffusion coefficient values for liquid mixtures of bitumen + carbon dioxide vary over three orders of magnitude when different analysis methods are applied to the same experimental data. In this contribution, we illustrate the importance of measuring composition profiles within liquids as a function of time, as a basis for mutual diffusion coefficient computation, and for allowing explicitly for the variation of diffusion coefficient and liquid density with composition in the analysis of composition profile data. Such inclusions eliminate apparent temporal variations of mutual diffusion coefficients and yield values consistent with relevant theories and exogenous data sets. Liquid-phase mutual diffusion coefficients computed for the mixtures Athabasca Bitumen + pentane and Cold Lake Bitumen + heptane exemplify the experimental and data analysis approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".