MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071836600 · doi:10.1080/10916460500411796

Liquid-phase Mutual Diffusion Coefficients for Heavy Oil + Light Hydrocarbon Mixtures

2007· article· en· W2071836600 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePetroleum Science and Technology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicDiffusion Coefficients in Liquids
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsDiffusionAsphaltViscosityThermodynamicsHeptaneChemistryPhase (matter)Light crude oilMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Liquid-phase mutual diffusion coefficients are a key parameter in reservoir simulation models related to both primary production and envisioned secondary recovery processes for heavy oil and bitumen. The measurement of liquid-phase mutual diffusion coefficients in bitumen and heavy oil + light hydrocarbon or gas mixtures present numerous experimental and data analysis challenges due to the viscosity and opacity of the mixtures, the variability of density, viscosity and mutual diffusion coefficient with composition, and the multi-phase nature of these mixtures. Data analysis challenges are particularly acute. For example, recently reported mutual diffusion coefficient values for liquid mixtures of bitumen + carbon dioxide vary over three orders of magnitude when different analysis methods are applied to the same experimental data. In this contribution, we illustrate the importance of measuring composition profiles within liquids as a function of time, as a basis for mutual diffusion coefficient computation, and for allowing explicitly for the variation of diffusion coefficient and liquid density with composition in the analysis of composition profile data. Such inclusions eliminate apparent temporal variations of mutual diffusion coefficients and yield values consistent with relevant theories and exogenous data sets. Liquid-phase mutual diffusion coefficients computed for the mixtures Athabasca Bitumen + pentane and Cold Lake Bitumen + heptane exemplify the experimental and data analysis approaches. Keywords: bitumencoefficientdatadiffusionexperimenthydrocarbonliquidmixturemutualtheory ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank Professor A. Kantzas at the University of Calgary for providing access to the Cold Lake bitumen + heptane composition profile data. Professor E. S. Meadows at the University of Alberta, Professor J. Abedi at the University of Calgary, Dr. M. Satyro at VMG, and Dr. D. Coombe at CMG all made valuable suggestions at various stages of this work. We also acknowledge and appreciate the financial support from the sponsors of the NSERC-Industrial Research Chair in petroleum thermodynamics: Alberta Energy Research Institute, Albian Sands Energy Inc., Computer Modeling Group Ltd., Conocophillips Inc., Imperial Oil Resources, NEXEN Inc., Natural Resources Canada, Petroleum Society of the CIMM, Oilphase-DBR, Oilphase—a Schlumberger Company, Schlumberger, Syncrude Canada Ltd., NSERC. Notes *Standard deviation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it