Clinical Efficacy and Tolerability of Cimicoxib in Dogs with Osteoarthritis: A Multicentre Prospective Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Cimicoxib is a coxib recently licensed in Europe for pain and inflammation associated with osteoarthritis (OA), and the management of perioperative pain due to orthopaedic or soft tissue surgery. Purpose: This prospective study was to complete the product information for the end users by providing additional scientific data obtained after a thirty-day treatment course of cimicoxib in dogs with OA, and to collect owners’ feedback. Data were collected from nine European countries with 492 client owned dogs recruited to the trial. Dogs were treated once daily with 2 mg/kg cimicoxib orally. Immediately before, at Day (D) 15 and D30 after the start of treatment veterinarians and owners scored body condition, appetite, locomotion, lameness, pain on palpation and manipulation of the joint and joint effusion (veterinarians) and dog demeanor and well being (owners). In a subset of dogs, serum urea (n = 191), creatinine (n = 184), AST (n = 141) and ALT (n = 174) were measured at day (D) 0 and D30. Statistical tests were carried out to detect significant changes in the clinical parameters with time. Results and Discussion: Veterinary and owner assessments were analysed from 236 and 215 dogs respectively. Improvements in locomotion, mobility, pain scores and dog demeanor and body condition were identified; outcome measures assessed by veterinarians continued to improve after 15 days of treatment up to the 30-day time point. At D30 a significantly higher number of dogs had an urea concentration superior to the upper limit of the reference range. However, there was no significant difference for creatinine, ALT and AST. Conclusions: A 30-day treatment course with cimicoxib improved locomotion and decreased pain scores in dogs with OA, with minimal adverse effects. These data, support pre-clinical data in dogs receiving cimicoxib and are useful for veterinarians making decisions about which NSAID to administer to dogs that require pain management for OA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".