NOVEL APPROACHES TO CRYOPRESERVATION OF HUMAN PANCREATIC ISLETS1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Optimized conditions for survival and function of human islets must be defined if sufficient islets are to be recovered from a single human donor pancreas to reverse type-1 diabetes after isolation, cryopreservation, and transplantation. The objective of this study was to compare the cryoprotective effect of ethylene glycol (EG) with the standard cryoprotectant, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), on isolated human islet survival and function. Furthermore, the effect of different addition protocols and equilibrium concentrations of the cryoprotectants were studied. METHODS: Islets were isolated from human pancreata by using standard techniques of collagenase digestion and discontinuous Ficoll gradient purification. Aliquots of freshly isolated human islets were cryopreserved in six groups by using DMSO or EG. Cryoprotectants were added stepwise to produce a final concentration of 1.5 or 2.0 M, or added in a single step to a concentration of 1.5 M. Islets were cryopreserved by using established protocols and cultured for 48 hr at 37 degrees C before assessment of percentage of recovery and in vitro viability. RESULTS: After cryopreservation, percentage of recovery of islets was significantly higher in the group treated with 1.5 M of DMSO added in a stepwise protocol (74+/-3%, mean+/-SEM) compared with the standard 2.0 M of DMSO (62+/-4%) (P<0.05, unpaired t test, n=6). There was no difference between the recovery of islets cryopreserved with either 1.5 M of DMSO stepwise (74+/-3%) or 1.5 M of DMSO one-step (69+/-3%). Islet recovery was higher in groups treated with DMSO compared with EG, regardless of concentration of cryoprotectant or addition protocol, although the difference was significant only when comparing DMSO and EG 1.5 M one-step. Furthermore, islets treated with 1.5 M of DMSO, added either stepwise (6.0+/-0.4) or in one-step (6.5+/-0.8), had significantly higher stimulation indices compared with islets treated with the standard cryoprotectant for human islets, 2.0 M of DMSO (4.5+/-0.5) (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that a lower concentration of DMSO (1.5 M) allows for the cryopreservation of human islets with superior survival and preservation of function post-culture compared with 2.0 M of DMSO and various concentrations of EG.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".