That eagle covering me: transitioning and connected autonomy for emerging adults with cystinosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rare diseases pose transitioning challenges owing to limited provider expertise and changing healthcare systems. The timeframe and developmental changes of emerging adulthood overlap with the transition of patients with cystinosis from pediatric to adult-oriented healthcare. METHODS: This study utilized techniques of qualitative grounded theory to explore the experiences of adults aged 18-47 with cystinosis, and their parents, with a focus on the transition to adulthood and adult-oriented care. Forty-six individuals from 21 families were recruited online and at cystinosis conferences to participate in focus groups and/or individual interviews. The constant comparative method was used to conduct both line-by-line and focused coding of verbatim transcripts. RESULTS: The following elements were reported to be critical to the transition to adulthood and adult-oriented care: gaining skills and responsibility for disease management, progressing toward autonomy while remaining connected to caregivers, and having strong communication with and between providers. CONCLUSIONS: Data analysis identified behaviors and relationships that support and/or threaten autonomy and treatment adherence. Participants described institutional, relational, and practical barriers to transition. Suggestions for improving transitioning include: identifying patient/family strengths and improving pediatric-adult provider partnerships and communication. Further research is needed into the experience of patients before and after transition to adult-oriented care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".