Robust Multiuser Sequential Channel Sensing and Access in Dynamic Cognitive Radio Networks: Potential Games and Stochastic Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies the problem of multiuser sequential channel sensing and access in dynamic cognitive radio networks, in which the active-user set is randomly changing from slot to slot. Furthermore, each user only has its individual information with no information exchange among users. The goal of the users is to determine their channel sensing order. We first define a generalized interference metric to address the overlapping of channel sensing order and establish two optimization objectives: minimizing the aggregate interference for each active-user set and minimizing the expected aggregate interference for all potential users. It is challenging to solve the two optimization problems, even in a centralized manner, because the active-user set is randomly changing, and the probability distributions of the active-user sets are unknown to the users. We then propose two noncooperative game models to solve the optimization problems: a state-based one-shot game and a robust game. We prove that they are potential games and that the best Nash equilibrium of the two games corresponds to the optimal solutions of the two optimization problems, respectively. To cope with theuncertain,dynamic, andincompleteinformation constraints in the dynamic networks, we propose a stochastic learning algorithm, which is analytically proven to converge to Nash equilibria of the two formulated games in the presence of a changing active-player set. Finally, simulation results are presented to validate the convergence and superior performance of the proposed learning algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".