Surgical Hip Dislocation for Anatomic Reorientation of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: Preliminary Results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Controversies exist regarding the best treatment for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Subcapital anatomical reorientation of the epiphysis by surgical dislocation and a retinacular soft tissue flap has been described recently as an effective approach. We evaluated the clinical and radiographic efficacy of this technique and compared these to published results. A series of 20 SCFE (18 stable, 2 unstable) treated by subcapital re-orientation through surgical hip dislocation and an extended retinacular soft tissue flap was reviewed retrospectively. Preoperatively and at most recent follow-up, patients were clinically examined with regard to pain and function according to the Harris hip score and to the Western Ontario and McMaster universities (WOMAC) score. Radiological examination included measurement of preoperative and postoperative anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (L) Southwick angles; and at follow-up the alpha angle was measured. The average follow-up time was 24 months. The mean WOMAC score was 2.80 post-operatively. The mean pre-operative slip angle was 40.2 degrees on the AP view and 50.65 degrees on the lateral view. Post-operatively, the mean values were 7,20 degrees on the AP view and 9,45 degrees on the lateral view. The mean post-operative average alpha angle was 43,11 degrees. No cases of avascular necrosis were seen. Our short term clinical and radiographic results are similar to outcomes published in the recent literature. The small number of technical complications appears favourable considering the surgical complexity of the procedure, and our technique offers clear advantages in treating these complex deformities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".