Wavelet Analysis of Flow-Induced Forces on Two Side-by-Side Stationary Cylinders: Reynolds Number Effect
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present study, the effect of Reynolds number (Re) on flow interference between two side-by-side stationary cylinders and the associated flow-induced forces are investigated using a finite element method. The pitch ratio chosen is T/D = 1.7, and Re is varied within the range of laminar flow regime, i.e., 60 < Re < 200. The method of continuous wavelet transform is used to analyze flow-induced forces, especially their time-variant features. Flow patterns in the form of vorticity plot are presented to demonstrate the underlying physics. It is found that flow interference initially occurs in the inner vortices shed from the two cylinders, and extends to the outer vortices with increment of Re. The flow behind two cylinders undergoes three regimes: Regime I - unbiased gap flow, Regime II - stable biased gap flow, and Regime III - unstable gap flow. Flow-induced forces show significant variations when the flow transits from one regime to another. In particular, during the transition from Regime II to III, the forces not only increase by amplitude, but also change their nature from deterministic to random, and show some non-stationary features. This is shown to be caused by the amalgamation of inner and outer vortices behind the two cylinders when the flow interference extends from inner vortices to outer vortices. Whenever possible, the present results are compared with experimental measurements and theoretical predictions. The numerical simulations are consistent with these other results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".