Parenteral vitamin B12 in macrocytic hemodialysis patients reduced MMA levels but did not change mean red cell volume or hemoglobin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Unexplained macrocytic anemia was common in our hemodialysis (HD) unit. Vitamin B12 requirements may be higher in HD patients; therefore, patients may be deficient despite "normal" serum levels. We studied vitamin B12 status and the effect of parenteral vitamin B12 administration in macrocytic HD patients. A normocytic group was included for comparison. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 62 HD patients (34 macrocytic, 28 normocytic) from November 2008 to March 2009. Patients were on stable doses of darbepoetin and iron replete. Vitamin B12 1,000 µg IV was given once weekly for 4 weeks and follow-up was 12 weeks. Methylmalonic acid (MMA) level was used as an indicator of vitamin B12 status. MCV and hemoglobin were also examined for an effect of B12 administration. RESULTS: At baseline: all patients had serum B12 levels > 200 pmol/l; 97% had serum folate levels > 55 nmol/l; there was no difference in serum B12 levels between groups (504 vs. 571 pmol/l, p = 0.18); MMA was higher in the macrocytic group (0.56 vs. 0.48 µmol/l, p = 0.048) and hemoglobin (Hg) was lower (119 vs. 125 g/l, p = 0.03); median darbepoetin dose was equivalent (20 µg/week). Following IV vitamin B12, the macrocytic group had a greater and more sustained reduction in MMA (-0.064 vs. -0.0066 µmol/l/wk, p = 0.004). There was no improvement in hemoglobin (Hg), reticulocyte count or MCV in either group. Median darbepoetin dose was unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: IV vitamin B12 led to a sustained decline in MMA levels in macrocytic patients, suggesting functional vitamin B12 deficiency at baseline. However, there were no significant changes in Hg or darbepoetin dose.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".