Serum Concentrations, Efficacy, and Safety of a New, Intravenously Administered Varicella Zoster Immune Globulin in Pregnant Women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chickenpox is teratogenic in humans, and varicella zoster immune globulin (VZIG) is given to pregnant women believed to be susceptible to the virus after contact with chickenpox. Available VZIG is given as intramuscular injections. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and serum concentrations of a new VZIG that can be given intravenously. The new VZIG (Cangene Pharm., Inc.) was compared to the standard VZIG (Massachusetts Public Health Biologic Laboratories) in a randomized protocol in 57 pregnant women seronegative to varicella zoster virus (VZV). Pregnant women received 125 units per 10 kg body weight to a maximal dose of 625 units. Women were evaluated on days 2, 7, 14, and 28 and at other times if symptoms developed into clinical varicella, which was scored by the Constitutional Illness Score. The new VZIG was comparable to the standard VZIG on all parameters of efficacy and safety. Levels of VZV antibodies at day 2 postinjection were significantly higher among those receiving the new preparation intravenously. The authors concluded that the new intravenous form of VZIG confers higher initial levels of VZV antibodies and is comparable in terms of its maternal efficacy and safety to the standard form of VZIG.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".