Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and the Pediatric Neurosurgeon: A 20-Year Institutional Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) undergo costly surveillance scanning for a variety of asymptomatic central nervous system lesions whose natural history is poorly understood. We performed a 20-year retrospective chart review of 25 patients with clinically proven NF1 who required surgery (group A) and contrasted this cohort with 150 NF1 patients who did not require surgery (group B). In group A, 52% of patients underwent multiple procedures for more than one lesion (p = 0.043). Group A patients were further distinguished from those in group B by exhibiting a greater number of optic gliomas (p = 0.015), nonoptic intracranial tumors (p = 0.006), cranial nerve (p = 0.000), paraspinal (p = 0.0062), craniofacial (p = 0.001) and visceral (p = 0.03) neurofibromas and moyamoya disease (p = 0.00), as well as a higher frequency of seizure disorder, sphenoid wing dysplasia and poor academic performance. Gadolinium enhancement occurred in 43% of optic gliomas, 50% of parenchymal gliomas, 100% of cranial nerve, 100% of plexus, 67% of paraspinal, 50% of craniofacial and 50% of visceral neurofibromas in group A, while only 1 group B tumor enhanced. In group A, radiological progression occurred after a median of 4 years from initial diagnosis for optic gliomas as well as cranial nerve, plexus and visceral neurofibromas, 2 years for paraspinal neurofibromas and brainstem gliomas and 2.7 years for craniofacial neurofibromas. Only 1 tumor progressed in group B. Therefore, a small subgroup of NF1 patients (12.5%) who require treatment are at risk of subsequently needing further surgical attention, whereas a larger group of NF1 patients (87.5%) carry an indolent form of the disease. We recommend imaging for asymptomatic, gadolinium-enhancing lesions every 2 years for optic pathway and parenchymal gliomas and cranial nerve and visceral neurofibromas, and every year for brainstem gliomas and paraspinal as well as craniofacial neurofibromas. Nonenhancing optic pathway lesions could be followed up radiographically much less often since they do not show progression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".