MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Special Section on Geomechanics and Geosynthetics

2012· article· en· W2072128130 on OpenAlexaff
Kianoosh Hatami, Richard J. Bathurst

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Geomechanics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeomechanicsGeosyntheticsSection (typography)Geotechnical engineeringGeologySpecial sectionEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This special section on geomechanics and geosynthetics began at the end of September 2009 with targeted invitations to selected individuals with recognized expertise in the interdisciplinary fields of geomechanics and geosynthetics. Each submission was peer reviewed in strict accordance with the Journal’s policy. The result is the seven papers that appear in this special section. These seven papers address different uses of geosynthetics with a primary focus on their reinforcement function in geotechnical and transportation applications. These applications include geosynthetic-encased columns, geogrid-soil and geogrid-aggregate interactions in reinforced soil structures and reinforced road bases, embankments over rate-sensitive soils, geosynthetic-reinforced piled embankments, seismic behavior of reinforced soil walls, and load and resistance factor design for internal stability of reinforced soil walls. These papers use a range of modeling approaches in geomechanical analysis, including three-dimensional and two-dimensional finite-element modeling, mechanistic-empirical modeling, discreteelement modeling, and probabilistic methods. The breadth of the geosynthetics applications addressed in this collection and the range of analytical, computational, and validation methods employed by the authors demonstrate their value to improve our understanding of the complex mechanics of geosynthetic-geomaterial systems and to advance analysis and design methods. We hope that the readers of this issue will find this special section to be a valuable collection of papers, especially for those interested in numerical modeling of geosynthetics applications, verification of analytical and probabilistic-based design methods, and researchers developing new constitutive models for soils, aggregates, and geosynthetics. We congratulate and thank all of the authors who contributed to this special section. We would also like to acknowledge the valuable contribution of the anonymous reviewers. Finally, we would like to express our appreciation to Professor Musharraf Zaman, the Editor-in-Chief of the International Journal of Geomechanics, for his support and patience in seeing this special section through to completion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score0.438

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of GeomechanicsSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationFrench-language works237,207