MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072182744 · doi:10.1093/mnras/sts094

The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III DR9 Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity

2012· article· en· W2072182744 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ashley J. Ross, Will J. Percival, Gong‐Bo Zhao, Marc Manera, Alvise Raccanelli, É. Aubourg, Dmitry Bizyaev, H. Brewington, J. Brinkmann, Joel R. Brownstein, Antonio J. Cuesta, L. A. N. da Costa, Daniel J. Eisenstein, Garrett Ebelke, Hong Guo, J.–Ch. Hamilton, M. Vargas-Magaña, Elena Malanushenko, Viktor Malanushenko, Claudia Maraston, Francesco Montesano, Robert C. Nichol, Daniel Oravetz, Kaike Pan, Francisco Prada, Ariel G. Sánchez, Lado Samushia, David J. Schlegel, Donald P. Schneider, Hee‐Jong Seo, A. Sheldon, Audrey Simmons, Stephanie A. Snedden, Molly E. C. Swanson, D. Thomas, Jeremy L. Tinker, Rita Tojeiro, Idit Zehavi

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBrookhaven National LaboratoryScience and Technology Facilities CouncilSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryUniversity of California, Santa CruzUniversity of California, IrvineUniversity of CambridgeYork UniversityHarvard UniversityTexas Christian UniversityCarnegie Mellon UniversityOffice of SciencePrinceton UniversityUniversity of WashingtonAlfred P. Sloan FoundationJohns Hopkins UniversityCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityOhio State UniversityNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthYale UniversityVanderbilt UniversityFermilabNational Science FoundationU.S. Department of EnergyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPhysicsGalaxyAstrophysicsRedshiftBaryonSkyLocal GroupAstronomyDwarf galaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyse the density field of 264 283 galaxies observed by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS)-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) and included in the SDSS Data Release 9 (DR9). In total, the SDSS DR9 BOSS data include spectroscopic redshifts for over 400 000 galaxies spread over a footprint of more than 3000 deg2. We measure the power spectrum of these galaxies with redshifts 0.43 < z < 0.7 in order to constrain the amount of local non-Gaussianity, | $f{{\rm _N}{\rm _L}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!^{\rm local}}$|, in the primordial density field, paying particular attention to the impact of systematic uncertainties. The BOSS galaxy density field is systematically affected by the local stellar density and this influences the ability to accurately measure | $f{{\rm _N}{\rm _L}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!^{\rm local}}$|. In the absence of any correction, we find (erroneously) that the probability that | $f{{\rm _N}{\rm _L}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!^{\rm local}}$| is greater than zero, P(| $f{{\rm _N}{\rm _L}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!^{\rm local}}$| > 0), is 99.5 per cent. After quantifying and correcting for the systematic bias and including the added uncertainty, we find − 45 < | $f{{\rm _N}{\rm _L}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!^{\rm local}}$| < 195 at 95 per cent confidence and P(| $f{{\rm _N}{\rm _L}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!^{\rm local}}$| > 0) = 91.0 per cent. A more conservative approach assumes that we have only learnt the k dependence of the systematic bias and allows any amplitude for the systematic correction; we find that the systematic effect is not fully degenerate with that of | $f{{\rm _N}{\rm _L}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!^{\rm local}}$|, and we determine that −82 < | $f{{\rm _N}{\rm _L}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!^{\rm local}}$| < 178 (at 95 per cent confidence) and P(| $f{{\rm _N}{\rm _L}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!^{\rm local}}$| > 0) = 68 per cent. This analysis demonstrates the importance of accounting for the impact of Galactic foregrounds on | $f{{\rm _N}{\rm _L}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!^{\rm local}}$| measurements. We outline the methods that account for these systematic biases and uncertainties. We expect our methods to yield robust constraints on | $f{{\rm _N}{\rm _L}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!^{\rm local}}$| for both our own and future large-scale structure investigations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations156
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207