MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072182744 · doi:10.1093/mnras/sts094

The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III DR9 Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity

2012· article· en· W2072182744 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ashley J. Ross, Will J. Percival, Gong‐Bo Zhao, Marc Manera, Alvise Raccanelli, É. Aubourg, Dmitry Bizyaev, H. Brewington, J. Brinkmann, Joel R. Brownstein, Antonio J. Cuesta, L. A. N. da Costa, Daniel J. Eisenstein, Garrett Ebelke, Hong Guo, J.–Ch. Hamilton, M. Vargas-Magaña, Elena Malanushenko, Viktor Malanushenko, Claudia Maraston, Francesco Montesano, Robert C. Nichol, Daniel Oravetz, Kaike Pan, Francisco Prada, Ariel G. Sánchez, Lado Samushia, David J. Schlegel, Donald P. Schneider, Hee‐Jong Seo, A. Sheldon, Audrey Simmons, Stephanie A. Snedden, Molly E. C. Swanson, D. Thomas, Jeremy L. Tinker, Rita Tojeiro, Idit Zehavi

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBrookhaven National LaboratoryScience and Technology Facilities CouncilSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryUniversity of California, Santa CruzUniversity of California, IrvineUniversity of CambridgeYork UniversityHarvard UniversityTexas Christian UniversityCarnegie Mellon UniversityOffice of SciencePrinceton UniversityUniversity of WashingtonAlfred P. Sloan FoundationJohns Hopkins UniversityCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityOhio State UniversityNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthYale UniversityVanderbilt UniversityFermilabNational Science FoundationU.S. Department of EnergyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPhysicsGalaxyAstrophysicsRedshiftBaryonSkyLocal GroupAstronomyDwarf galaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations156
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207