Health-related quality-of-life and behavioural outcome in survivors of childhood meningitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe behavioural and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes in survivors of childhood meningitis and identify variables predictive of psychosocial outcome. METHODS: Psychosocial outcomes were measured via parent and teacher report using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and the Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL Core & Fatigue versions). Participants were 346[corrected] consecutive survivors admitted to a regional children's hospital (1991-2007). One hundred and twelve of 346 (32%) [corrected] returned postal questionnaires and file review confirmed diagnosis in 100 cases. RESULTS: At a mean of 8 years post-illness 32% of parents and 19% of teachers reported clinically significant behavioural difficulties on the SDQ; along with significantly lowered HRQoL on PedsQL measures. Later sequelae such as learning disability and hearing/visual impairment, along with socioeconomic status, independently predicted behavioural and HRQoL outcome on regression analysis. Acute disease complications were associated with later occurrence of epilepsy, learning disability and visual impairment, but not directly with psychosocial outcomes at time of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors with these sequelae should be screened for emotional and behavioural difficulties during key developmental transitions such as school entry. These findings strongly support recent UK clinical guidelines (NICE and SIGN) proposing that parents be made aware of possible psychological complications on discharge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".