MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072219750 · doi:10.5942/jawwa.2013.105.0156

Submerged appurtenances and pipelines: An assessment of water levels and contaminant occurrence

2013· article· en· W2072219750 on OpenAlexafffund
Gabrielle Ebacher, Marie‐Claude Besner, Michèle Prévost

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Water Works Association · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Treatment and Disinfection
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceSurface runoffPiezometerContaminationGroundwaterEnvironmental engineeringFecal coliformHydrology (agriculture)Water qualityEnvironmental chemistryGeotechnical engineeringAquiferGeologyChemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Submerged air vacuum valves and pipe leaks are potential entry points of contaminated water into drinking water distribution systems under low‐pressure conditions. Water levels in 20 valve vaults and 17 groundwater wells were monitored weekly for 8 months. The assembled data set indicated that water mains and air vacuum valves were commonly submerged in the investigated system. Urban runoff was found to be the dominant source of flooding in 11 of the 16 vaults containing water. A subset of 14 vaults and 10 piezometers were sampled for microbial and chemical parameters. Concentrations of chemical contaminants generally did not exceed drinking water standards. However, high counts of microbial fecal indicators were detected in numerous vaults. Runoff volumes of up to 255 L/mm of rainfall were found to enter a tested vault, and runoff water was identified as the main source of pesticides, personal care products, microbial fecal indicators, and hydrocarbons in vaults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Water Works AssociationSame topicWater Treatment and DisinfectionFrench-language works237,207