MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072283932 · doi:10.1071/rdv20n1ab8

8 FLOW CYTOMETRIC MONITORING OF CHOLERA TOXIN B SUBUNIT BINDING TO BOVINE SPERMATOZOA

2007· article· en· W2072283932 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Boilard, Jean‐Martin Beaulieu, Patrick Blondin

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitationLipid raftCholera toxinCell biologyGangliosideSphingomyelinSphingolipidChemistryFlow cytometrySpermMembraneBiologyBiochemistryMolecular biologyMotilityMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to become able to fertilize, mammalian spermatozoa must undergo a series of biochemical modifications. This process called capacitation involves several changes of the content and the ultrastucture of the plasma membrane. Among these changes, loss of cholesterol from the plasma membrane is required. Lipid rafts are detergent-insoluble plasma membrane domains rich in cholesterol and sphingolipids. Some proteins are confined to lipid rafts while others are excluded. It has been hypothesized in the past that the loss of cholesterol could destabilize and relocate lipid rafts and would thus affect protein interactions in the plasma membrane, thereby leading to downstream events involved in the capacitation process. Thus, quantification of lipid rafts within the membrane of spermatozoa would become useful to monitor sperm functions and maturation level. The present study aimed to quantify lipid rafts in bovine spermatozoa using the Vibrant Lipid Raft detection kit from Molecular Probes (Invitrogen Canada, Inc., Burlingame, Ontario, Canada) and flow cytometry. The Vibrant kit uses the cholera toxin B subunit (CT-B) and claims to detect ganglioside Gm1 that sublocalizes within lipid rafts. Briefly, freshly ejaculated and frozen/thawed spermatozoa were washed once by centrifugation at 250 g for five min in sp-Talp and were then re-suspended in sp-Talp containing 1 ¼g mL–1 CT-B. Then, cells were incubated at 4°C for 10 min, washed in chilled sp-Talp, incubated for 15 min in the presence of an anti-CT-B antibody coupled to the Alexa Fluor® 488 dye (Molecular Probes), and washed again to remove excess antibody. Spermatozoa were then analyzed with a BD LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Two populations showing different fluorescence levels were observed in all samples. Greater proportions of spermatozoa displayed the high fluorescence pattern in cryopreserved samples (37.9%) when compared to freshly ejaculated spermatozoa (8.2%) ( P < 0.01). Also, when compared to freshly ejaculated spermatozoa, increased proportions of high fluorescence was detected following a 6-h incubation in sp-Talp containing bicarbonate and BSA. These results suggest that capacitation and cryopreservation both promote exposure of CT-B binding molecules in bovine spermatozoa. Microscopic observation of labeled cryopreserved spermatozoa did not yield the expected raft labeling patterns, but rather 5 different patterns of labeling. In the past, some of these patterns were recognized to be associated with capacitation and acrosome reaction. At this point, more work is needed to confirm which of the fluorescent patterns observed in microscopy corresponds to the enhanced fluorescence sperm population observed by flow cytometry and to directly associate this enhanced fluorescence to capacitation or the acrosome reaction. In conclusion, it appears that the Vibrant kit from Molecular Probes cannot be used to quantify lipid rafts by flow cytometry. Nevertheless, it might be an interesting tool to use in flow cytometry to monitor membrane changes associated with capacitation or cryo-damage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207