MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072352988 · doi:10.1002/ejic.200400594

New Insights into the Stoichiometric and Catalytic Reactivity of Unsaturated Pd<sub>3</sub>(dppm)<sub>3</sub>CO<sup><i>n</i>+</sup> Clusters (<i>n</i> = 0, 1) Towards Halocarbons – First Evidence for Inorganic By‐Products

2005· article· en· W2072352988 on OpenAlexaff
Dominique Lucas, Frédéric Lemaître, Beatriz Gallego‐Gómez, Cyril Cugnet, Philippe Richard, Yves Mugnier, Pierre D. Harvey

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Inorganic Chemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryStoichiometryCatalysisAdductBromideIodideReactivity (psychology)Medicinal chemistryInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The title clusters, Pd3(dppm)3(CO)+ and Pd3(dppm)3(CO)0 can be electrochemically generated from the 1‐ and 2‐electron reductions, respectively, of the Pd3(dppm)3(CO)2+ cluster [dppm = bis(diphenylphosphanyl)methane; Pd32+]. Pd3+ reacts in a stoichiometric ratio with methyl iodide, MeI, and benzyl bromide, BzBr, in THF to provide the corresponding Pd3(X)+ adducts (X = I, Br respectively) as inorganic products. Other products are Bz2 and PhMe for BzBr but, for MeI, no organic product was observed (since they are too volatile). In the presence of the same substrates, Pd30 also reacts in a stoichiometric ratio to form the same organics and the Pd3‐(X)+ adducts (X = I and Br). However for MeI, the major inorganic product is the A‐frame Pd2(dppm)2(Me)2I+ binuclear complex. For BzBr, the corresponding A‐frame complex Pd2(dppm)2(Bz)2Br+ could not be detected. The spin‐trap agents, 2,2,6,6‐tetramethylpiperidin‐1‐oxyl (TEMPO) and 5,5′‐dimethyl‐1‐pyrroline N‐oxide (DMPO), have been used to demonstrate the intermediacy of the radical Bz·. The catalytic generation of “Bz·” was performed using two methods, i.e. 1) using a copper anode as the working electrode [Pd3‐(Br)+ + Cu – e– → Pd32+ + CuBr (s)] and 2) using a carbon cathode as the working electrode [Pd3(Br)+ + 2e– → Pd30 + Br–]. The chemical yields for Bz2 vary between 50 and 56 % and the Faradic yield is of the order of 90 % for method 1 and between 52 and 59 % for method 2 [taking into account the quantity of electricity necessary to reduce the catalyst Pd3‐(Br)+]. The X‐ray structure of Pd3(dppm)3(CO)(Br)+ is presented and the following parameters were recorded: monoclinic space group P21/n, a = 10.6546(2), b = 37.1091(7), c = 21.2714(7) Å, β = 91.55(1)o, V = 8407.3(4) Å3, Z = 4, R1 = 0.0581 [I > 2σ(I)], wR2 = 0.1478 (all data). (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2005)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Inorganic ChemistrySame topicCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsFrench-language works237,207