Examination of the proposition that Cu(II) can be required for charge neutrality in a sulfide lattice — Cu in tetrahedrites and sphalerite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Synchrotron XPS and Cu L 2,3 -edge NEXAFS spectroscopic data for a natural tetrahedrite surface prepared by fracture under UHV were in accord with the composition of the mineral and its expected semiconductivity. The 2p binding energy for the 6-coordinate S atoms was found to be not detectably greater than that for the 4-coordinate S atoms, and surface species were not clearly discernible in either surface-optimized S 2p or Cu 2p spectra. The Cu 2p and Cu L 2,3 -edge spectra indicated that all Cu in the mineral was indisputably Cu(I). The Cu L 2,3 -edge spectra of relatively pure natural sphalerite treated with mildly acidic aqueous cupric solution revealed the presence of Cu(II) in the outermost layer of the fracture surfaces, but it was concluded that most of the Cu near the surface of the mineral was in formal oxidation state Cu(I), albeit with higher than normal d 9 character. The Cu(I) absorption peak was at an energy much lower than for the tetrahedrite absorption edge, but still consistent with Cu(I) in 4-fold coordination by S. The Cu(II) was consistent with Cu bonded both to S atoms in the outermost layer of the sphalerite and to O atoms in chemisorbed water. S 2p spectra determined at different photon energies revealed high binding energy components arising from oligosulfide-like environments in the outermost layers, but not necessarily in a completely restructured lattice and not in a Cu oligosulfide only. The data indicated some loss of Zn in addition to the Zn that had been replaced by Cu in the outermost layers of the sulfide lattice. The presence of these oligosulfide-like environments precluded the detection of S with formal oxidation state greater than (-II) that might have arisen only from Cu(I) in the S lattice. No evidence was obtained for the presence of Cu(II) in a sulfide lattice, but it was not possible to exclude the possibility of a very low concentration because of the presence of the Cu(II) bonded to both S and O at the surface of the treated sphalerite.Key words: tetrahedrite, sphalerite, copper uptake, XPS, NEXAFS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".