MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072461036 · doi:10.1016/j.provac.2009.07.025

Adjuvanted vaccine components: Analysis of structure and stability

2009· article· en· W2072461036 on OpenAlexaff
Marina Kirkitadze, Ankit Sinha, Jian Hu, Wayne Williams, G A Cates

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia in Vaccinology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsSanofi (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpitopeImmunogenicityBiologyDNA vaccinationVirologyCytotoxic T cellCD8AntigenTransgeneImmune systemImmunizationImmunologyMajor histocompatibility complexIn vitroGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An HLA-A2.1 transgenic rabbit /Cottontail rabbit papillomavirus (CRPV) infection model has been reported previously. In this study, we incorporated online MHCI epitope prediction software and HLA-A2.1 transgenic mouse and rabbit systems together to demonstrate an efficient way to identify and test immunogenicity of two HLA-A2.1 restricted epitopes from CRPVE1 (161-169 LLFRQAHSV and 303-311 MLQEKPFQL). Both epitopes were able to induce specific cytotoxic CD8 T cells in HLA-A2.1 mice and rabbits after peptide and DNA immunization and in vitro stimulation respectively. Using an epitope DNA vaccination method, we achieved partial and complete protection against CRPV DNA challenge by CRPVE1/161-169 and CRPVE1/303-311 respectively in HLA-A2.1 transgenic outbred rabbits. CRPVE1/303-311 also showed strong and specific therapeutic effects in CRPV-infected HLA-A2.1 transgenic outbred rabbits. Interestingly, epitope CRPVE1/303-311 (but not E1/161-169) showed strong protective immunity in non-transgenic EIII/JC inbred (but not outbred) NZW rabbits. Our data demonstrates an efficient way to identify HLA-A2.1 restricted epitopes for the development of prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.576
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProcedia in VaccinologySame topicImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesFrench-language works237,207