Galvanic sulphide oxidation as a metal-leaching mechanism and its environmental implications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Following a brief review of the theoretical aspects of galvanic sulphide oxidation, the significance of galvanic interaction in the oxidation of natural mixed sulphide assemblages is demonstrated using test materials prepared from sulphide-containing rocks in a series of chemical and microbial weathering experiments. The test results indicate that: (1) metal leaching can effectively proceed even in a near-neutral environment; and (2) the occurrence of acid mine drainage can be delayed due to cathodic protection of an acid-generating sulphide such as pyrite from oxidative dissolution. While microbial mediation may enhance the weathering of sulphides with a high electrode potential, the competing galvanic processes diminish the dominating role of the microbes in effecting the oxidation of sulphides with a low electrode potential when the sulphides occur in a mixed assemblage. In-situ potential measurements on sulphide surfaces with micro-electrodes demonstrated the occurrence of a significant potential difference between a contacting sulphide pair sufficient to sustain galvanic interaction for the duration of the experiments. It is also shown that galvanic sulphide oxidation and hence metal leaching can occur even under an oxygenated water cover. Therefore, subaqueous disposal may not be the best management option for all reactive mine wastes, especially those containing metals or trace elements that remain mobile under near-neutral pH conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it