REVASCULARIZATION OF SYMPTOMATIC SUBACUTE CEREBROVASCULAR OCCLUSIONS WITH A SELF-EXPANDING INTRACRANIAL STENT SYSTEM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In some patients, collateral circulation may preserve the viability of brain parenchyma distal to an intracranial arterial occlusion for hours or days after the presenting event. These patients may be good candidates for revascularization, even when they present outside of the accepted 6-hour time window for stroke intervention. METHODS: Three patients were revascularized with the Wingspan stent system (Boston Scientific/Target, Fremont, CA) after presenting with subacute occlusions of intracranial arteries and progressive ischemic symptoms despite maximal medical therapy. All pre- and postprocedural imaging data and clinical records were reviewed. RESULTS: Three patients (mean age, 64 years; 2 women, 1 man) presented with symptomatic intracranial occlusions of the internal carotid artery (n = 2) and vertebrobasilar system (n = 1). All 3 patients presented more than 6 hours after symptom onset, and no intravenous or intra-arterial thrombolysis had been instituted. In all cases, despite supportive medical therapy (anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy and induced hypertension), the patients continued to demonstrate progressive ischemia, both clinically and on diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. All patients were successfully revascularized without periprocedural complications and improved clinically after revascularization. CONCLUSION: In selected patients, symptomatic subacute occlusions of intracranial arteries may be revascularized using the Wingspan stent system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".