MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072648098 · doi:10.1002/pssc.200881345

Application of stimulated Raman pumping toward the first study of chemical reaction dynamics of the muonium atom with H<sub>2</sub>*

2009· article· en· W2072648098 on OpenAlexafffund
Oleksandr Sukhorukov, Pavel Bakule, Y. Matsuda, Saeid Kamal, Takamasa Momose, Donald G. Fleming

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysica status solidi. C, Conferences and critical reviews/Physica status solidi. C, Current topics in solid state physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuon and positron interactions and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaTRIUMF
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMuoniumAtomic physicsExcited stateChemistryExcitationHydrogenLaserMolecular beamRaman spectroscopySpectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)MoleculeOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The chemical reaction of interest, from the field of μSR spectroscopy, is that of the muonium atom (Mu) with molecular hydrogen in its first vibrational excited state. The stimulated Raman pumping (SRP) technique has been used to prepare H 2 in its ν = 1 state in a series of off‐line experiments at the LASIR Lab at UBC. Three different SRP excitation schemes employing the second harmonic of a Nd:YAG laser have been analysed in connection with this application, for 5.5, 13, and 26 cm‐long reaction cells. The laser energy varied from ∼80 to ∼550 mJ/pulse (or from ∼0.07 GW/cm 2 to ∼0.46 GW/cm 2 ) at a 10 Hz repetition rate. The importance of injection seeding of the Nd:YAG laser for efficient molecular excitation is shown. The major challenge of this experiment was to ensure a homogeneous excitation over a large volume (few cm 3 ) while achieving a high amount of vibrationally excited H 2 (3‐15 Torr). This is demanded by the requirements of superposition of a pulsed muon beam with the laser beam and the expected rate constant of the Mu + H 2 *(ν=1) →MuH + H reaction. In this endeavour it was also of interest to explore the effect of added moderator gas to the hydrogen and so the effect of Ar/Xe moderator on the efficiency of hydrogen pumping for different SRP excitation schemes is also shown. (© 2009 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.627
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysica status solidi. C, Conferences and critical reviews/Physica status solidi. C, Current topics in solid state physicsSame topicMuon and positron interactions and applicationsFrench-language works237,207