MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072750870 · doi:10.1038/npre.2010.5443.1

Keynote: A renaissance for the point mutation: from legacy data to semantic web service

2010· preprint· en· W2072750870 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher J. O. Baker

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Precedings · 2010
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMutationInformation retrievalAnnotationPopulationWorld Wide WebVisualizationConceptualizationArtificial intelligenceGeneticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Experiments that construct or discover protein point-mutations and investigate their functional consequences represent one of the cornerstones of biomedical investigation. And yet, despite the importance of these annotations, the interpretation and reuse of knowledge about their impacts remains a formidable task. This is due to a number of reasons including (i) the publishing of salient mutation impact descriptions in unstructured text, (ii) the existence of numerous boutique databases of mutation information which can have many years of latency, and (iii) errors within manually populated mutation databases. In recent years the mining of mutations from scientific documents has emerged as a promising research theme resulting in automated methods for mutation extraction and denovo database creation. While such methods have shown good performance, this alone does not suffice in seamlessly integrating mutation annotations to other biological datatypes.In this talk I demonstrate the challenges and innovations that have resulted in the deployment of semantic services that supply text-extracted mutation impact annotations on demand. These include; mutation grounding algorithms linking extracted mutations to the correct position on wild type protein sequences, the grounding of mutated protein properties to GO Molecular Function, rule based extraction of mutation impacts and impact direction, conceptualization and population of mutation impact ontology, graphical composition of SPARQL queries using mutation specific metadata, visualization of mutation impact annotations on protein structures, dynamic annotation of PubMed abstracts containing mutations mentions using the Semantic Assistant framework , and lastly SADI web service deployment facilitating queries that leverage mutation impact annotations integrated with multiple semantic web services, namely queries that select for mutations that impact specific protein properties, mutations that impact specific metabolic or signaling pathways, drugs that target mutated proteins, and literature describing mutations on proteins with a given nsSNP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature PrecedingsSame topicBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207