Computing combustion noise by combining large eddy simulations with analytical models for the propagation of waves through turbine blades
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two mechanisms control combustion noise generation as shown by Marble and Candel (1977) [1]: direct noise, in which acoustic waves propagate through the turbine stages and indirect noise, in which vorticity and/or entropy waves generate noise as they are convected through turbine stages. A method to calculate combustion-generated noise has been implemented in a tool called CHORUS. The method uses the large eddy simulations of the combustion chamber obtained with the unstructured solver AVBP developed at CERFACS (Schønfeld and Rudgyard, 1999 [2]) and analytical models for the propagation through turbine stages. The propagation models (Cumpsty and Marble, 1977 [3]) use the compact row hypothesis to write matching conditions between the inlet and the outlet of a turbine stage. Using numerical simulations, the validity of the analytical methods is studied and the errors made quantified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it