Contribution of Individual Amino Acids to the RNA Binding Activity of the Wilms’ Tumor Suppressor Protein WT1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In addition to binding to DNA, the zinc finger protein WT1 can also bind specifically to RNA. To determine the role of individual zinc fingers of the protein in this RNA binding activity, deletion and substitution mutants of the WT1 zinc finger domain were constructed. The effects of the various mutations on the binding of WT1 to the RNA aptamers RNA22 and RNA38 were determined using a quantitative equilibrium binding assay. The results indicate that zinc fingers 2 and 3 of WT1 are essential for the binding of the protein to the RNA aptamers. For both of these fingers, the arginine residue immediately preceding the alpha-helix makes a significant contribution to RNA binding. For zinc finger 2, a second arginine residue within the alpha-helix is also critical for RNA binding, while several alpha-helical residues in zinc finger 3 contribute to the overall affinity of WT1 for RNA. Investigating the effects of the same point mutations on DNA binding indicates that there are similarities and differences in the contributions of zinc fingers 2 and 3 to the DNA and RNA binding activities of WT1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".