Ladder‐Type π‐Conjugated 4‐Hetero‐1,4‐dihydrophosphinines: A Structure–Property Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pi-conjugated six-membered 1,4-dihydrophosphinines containing a heteroatom (Si, P, S) at the 4 position were synthesized and systematically studied. X-ray crystallographic analyses showed that the central six-membered heterocyclic rings are almost planar. The sum of the angles around the phosphorus atom increases by 23 degrees from the trivalent phosphorus to the phosphonium atom in the thiaphosphinine system, which is consistent with the NMR spectroscopic studies. UV/Vis spectroscopy and theoretical calculations revealed that the communication between the phosphorus center and the benzothiophene moiety is enhanced by the incorporation of a sulfur atom into the molecular scaffold. The increased conjugation endows the thiaphosphinines with interesting emission properties. Theoretical calculations supported the postulation that the orbital coupling between the pi system and a sigma* orbital could be enhanced in the thiaphosphinine system, especially through a phosphonium center. Cyclic voltammetry studies revealed that the thiaphosphinine oxide, thiaphosphonium, and cis-diphosphinine oxide exhibit quasi-reversible reduction processes, which demonstrate that simple changes in the bridge heteroatoms help to efficiently tune the redox properties of the ladder-type 4-hetero-1,4-dihydrophosphinines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".