MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072859559 · doi:10.1093/ehjci/jeu175

Feasibility and repeatability of optical coherence tomography measurements of pre-stent thrombus burden in patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI

2014· article· en· W2072859559 on OpenAlex
Olli A. Kajander, Laura Koistinen, Markku Eskola, Heini Huhtala, Ravinay Bhindi, Kari Niemelä, Sanjit S. Jolly, Tej Sheth, S.A. Kassam, R. Vijayraghavan, Shahar Lavi, A. Fung, Asim N. Cheema, Dimitrios Alexopoulos, Viktor Kočka, Warren J. Cantor, Goran Stanković, Vladimír Džavík, A. Della Siega

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConventional PCIMedicineStentPercutaneous coronary interventionThrombusOptical coherence tomographyMyocardial infarctionRadiologyCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Intracoronary thrombus is disrupted by stent deployment and confounded by the development of intrastent plaque prolapse. This study aims at investigating the feasibility and repeatability of thrombus quantification prior to stent implantation using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were enrolled in an OCT substudy of the TOTAL trial (a randomized trial of routine aspiration ThrOmbecTomy with PCI vs. PCI ALone in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI) of aspiration thrombectomy or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) alone in primary PCI (PPCI) of STEMI. Using OCT, thrombus burden (TB) and other measures of pre- and post-stent atherothrombus were analysed over the arterial segment defined by the final stent length. Feasibility was 86.2% (25/29 patients) for both pre- and post-stent OCT imaging. Altogether, 8111 OCT cross-sections were analysed. In Bland-Altman analyses of inter-observer variation (n = 25), the mean pre-stent TB was 8.76% for Observer 1 and 8.97% for Observer 2 (limits of agreement -2.6 to 2.2%). In Bland-Altman analyses of intra-observer variation (n = 15), the mean pre-stent TB was 8.06% for the first and 7.35% for the second round of analysis by Observer 1 (limits of agreement -1.72 to 3.15%). There was a good correlation between pre-stent TB and pre-stent quadrants with thrombus/mm (r = 0.97), but only modest correlation between pre-stent TB and post-stent atherothrombotic burden (ATB; r = 0.54). CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of pre-stent TB by OCT during the PPCI of STEMI is feasible and highly repeatable. Pre-stent TB is only modestly correlated with post-stent ATB, which indicates that pre-stent measurements might be of additional value when assessing the TB in STEMI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.515

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it