Perinatal Outcomes in Isolated Single Umbilical Artery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We sought to determine the rate of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies diagnosed with an isolated single umbilical artery (SUA). We performed a retrospective review comparing 68 pregnancies with an isolated SUA to 68 pregnancies with a three-vessel cord (3VC). Pregnancies with structural or karyotypic anomalies were excluded. Gestational age at delivery, birth weight, SGA rate, ponderal index, and rates of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit were compared between groups. Student T test and chi-square analysis were performed. Neonates with isolated SUA had a significantly smaller birth weight than those with a 3VC (3279 +/- 404 g versus 3423 +/- 374 g, P = 0.0168). There was no significant difference in rates of SGA (17.6% versus 8.8%, P = 0.06). Ponderal index was significantly less in those with SUA compared with 3VC (24.2 +/- 1.1 g/cm(3) versus 26.1 +/- 1.3 g/cm(3), P = 0.001). SUA neonates had a significantly longer length of neonatal intensive care unit stay than 3VC neonates (1.25 +/- 2.2 days versus 0.48 +/- 1.25 days, P < 0.023). Fetuses with a prenatal diagnosis of isolated umbilical artery have a significantly lower ponderal index compared with fetuses with a 3VC. Pregnancies with isolated SUA should undergo serial assessments for fetal growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".